Eradicating All Rules Through Article 42 of Law 21 of 2023 on The National Capital: A Study of Legal Norms and Morality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v32i1.3924Keywords:
Legal Norm, Morality of Law, National Capital CityAbstract
Legal norms in a regulation are the face of the government in implementing a policy, norms become an important point in the purpose of the law itself, namely justice. Norm ambiguity at least has several aspects, namely: open norms, vague norms, norms that conflict with other norms. All of these aspects are a unity in ‘norm conflict’. Article 42 of Law Number 21 of 2023 on the National Capital City (IKN) explains that, if there are regulations that conflict with the IKN Law, other regulations are considered invalid. Thus, many legal academics have criticised the article as a sweeping article. Thus, this research uses a normative research method that examines the norms and politics of law in Article 42 of the IKN Law using a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. Thus, this research shows that in terms of ratio legis, it is not possible for a law to declare another law invalid, which has an equal status as stipulated in Article 7 of Law Number 12/2011 on the Formation of LegislationReferences
Ackerman B, The New Separation of Powers (Harvard Law Review 2000)
Alchourrón CE, ‘Conflicts of Norms and the Revision of Normative Systems’ (1991) 10 Law and Philosophy 413
Anthony J. Sebok, ‘Misunderstanding Positivism’ (1995) 93 Michigan Law Review 2063
Asshiddiqie J, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Sinar Grafika 2010)
——, Teori Hierarki Norma Hukum (Konpress 2023)
Cohen H, ‘Notes on Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law’ (1981) 26 Catholic Lawyer 148
Deffains B, ‘Law and Norms: Experimental Evidence With Liability Rules’, (2019) Volume 60 International Review of Law and Economics 2
Diver CS, ‘Statutory Interpretation in the Administrative State’ (1985) 133 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150
Dworkin R, ‘Legal Research’ (1973) 102 the MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Art & Sciences 53
Edwin W. Tucker, ‘The Morality of Law, by Lon L. Fuller’ (1965) 40 Article Indiana Law Journal 274
Faesen L, ‘The Theoretical Underpinnings of Norm Development’ (2020)
Fauzar AS, ‘Analisis Terhadap Konflik Norma Pasal 9 Huruf G Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 Dengan Lampiran Bab I Huruf E Penggunaan Anggaran Nomor 8 Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 77 Tahun 2020’ (2022) 6 Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan 1251
H. L. A. Hart, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 598
Hadjon PM, Hukum Administrasi Dan Good Governance (Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta 2010)
Jimly Asshiddiqie, ‘Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia’ Artikel 1
Julius Stone, ‘Mystery and Mystique in the Basic Norm’ (1963) 26, No 1 The Modern Law Review 84
Kaplan O, ‘Good Governance, Right and State: Quo Vadis Administrative Law?’ (2022) 5 Uluslararası Yönetim 623
Kelsen H, ‘On the Basic Norm’ (1959) 47 California Law Review 107
Knight HK& M, ‘Norm and Value’ (1966) 54 California Law Review 1624
Lon L. Fuller & Kenneth I. Winston, ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review 378
Mark R. MacGuigan, ‘Law, Morals, and Positivisme’ (1961) 14 The University of Toronto Law Journal 1
Marmor A, ‘The Rule of Law and Its Limits’ (2004) 23 Law and Philosophy 2
Marzuki HL, ‘Kesadaran Berkonstitusi Dalam Kaitan Konstitusionalisme’ (2009) 6 Jurnal Konstitusi 19
Marzuki PM, Penelitian Hukum (Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta 2005)
Mas M, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi (Ghalia Indonesia 2017)
McAdams RH, ‘The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms’ (1997) 96 The Michigan Law Review Association 350
Meyer T, Dari Partai Otoriter Ke Partai Massa (Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) 2012)
Minda G, ‘The Lawyer - Economist at Chicago: Richard A. Posner and the Economic Analysis of Law’ (1978) 39 OHIO State Law Journal, 454
Mitchell B, ‘Process Equality, Substantive Equality and Recognising Disadvantage in Constitutional Equality Law’ (2015) 53 Irish Jurist 36
Mungan CF& MC, ‘Laws and Norms With (Un) Observable Actions’ (2022) 145 European Economic Review 2
Murphy C, ‘Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law’ (2005) 24 Law and Philosophy 239
Neuhaus PH, ‘Legal Certainty Versus Equity in the Conflict of Law’ (1963) 28 Duke University School of Law 796
Ossowska M, ‘Moral and Legal Norms’ (1960) 5 the Journal of Philosophy 251
Peter Cane, ‘Morality, Law And Conflicting Reasons For Action’ (2012) 71 The Cambridge Law Journal 60
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Prenada Media 2009)
Philipus M. Hadjon & Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, Argumentasi Hukum (Gadjah Mada University Press 2017)
Pino G, ‘The Place of Legal Positivism in Contemporary Constitutional States’ (1999) 18 Law and Philosophy 515
Poernomo AE& F, Hukum Administrasi (Cetakan Ke-2) (Sinar Grafika 2019)
Pound R, ‘Law and Morals-Jurisprudence and Ethics’ (1945) 23 North Carolina Law Review 185
Redi A, Hukum Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan (Sinar Grafika 2018)
Roznai Y, ‘The Theory and Practice of Supra-Constitutional Limits on Constitutional Amendments’ (2013) 62 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 261
Schyff MA& G van de, ‘Constitutional Review by the Judiciary in the Netherlands’ (2006) 66 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht Heidelberg Journal of International Law ( HJIL) 399
Seybert JH& LA, ‘What’s in a Norm? Mapping the Norm Definition Process in the Debate on Sustainable Development’ (2016) 22 Global Governance 254
Suriyani M, ‘Pertentangan Asas Perundang-Undangan Dalam Pengaturan Larangan Mobilisasi Anak Pada Kampanye Pemilu’ (2016) 13 Jurnal Konstitusi 672
Waldron J, ‘The Rule of Law and The Importance of Procedure’ (2011) 50 Nomos 4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muklis Al'anama, Hendro Prabowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
