The Legal Implications of Bankruptcy for Marital Property in the Absence of a Separation-of-Property Agreement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v15i1.5568Abstract
Marriage creates legal consequences not only for the personal relationship between spouses but also for the classification, control, and exposure of marital assets to third-party claims. This study examines how Indonesian law regulates marital property and determines the legal consequences when one spouse is declared bankrupt in the absence of a marriage agreement separating property. Using normative or doctrinal legal research, the study applies a statute approach and a conceptual approach to analyse the Marriage Law, the Civil Code, Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015. The findings show that Indonesian law distinguishes joint property from separate property, and this classification determines the extent to which assets may be subjected to bankruptcy administration. Articles 23 and 64 extend bankruptcy consequences to marriages governed by community of property, while Article 62 preserves the non-debtor spouse’s right to reclaim assets that legally remain separate. A marriage agreement may alter the patrimonial structure, including one made during marriage after Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, but its effectiveness against creditors depends on validity, timing, opposability, and existing third-party rights. This construction clarifies the legal position of the non-debtor spouse within bankruptcy proceedings. Accordingly, bankruptcy consequences cannot be determined solely by the existence or absence of a marriage agreement, but require an integrated analysis of asset classification, bankruptcy estate boundaries, and creditor protection.References
Afifa, Erina Nur, and Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemisahan Harta Bersama Setelah Dibuatnya Perjanjian Kawin dalam Masa Perkawinan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 3 (2025): 2314–2331. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.12993.
Ardhya, Si Ngurah, and I Putu Windu Mertha Sujana. “Konsekuensi Yuridis Berlakunya Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 7, no. 1 (2021): 295–314. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31493.
Bratakusuma, Ardi Hanum, Etty Susilowati, and Hendro Saptono. “Kedudukan Hukum Harta Bersama Suami Istri Setelah Putusan Pailit (Studi pada Putusan PT GPF).” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2016): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.11306.
Clarissha, Vindria Shafa, Recca Ayu Hapsari, and Yulia Hesti. “Kedudukan Harta Bersama yang Dijadikan Objek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan dalam Hutang Piutang dan Dieksekusi oleh Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 13/Pdt.Bth/2021/PN Tjk).” IBLAM Law Review 2, no. 1 (2022): 52–72. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v2i1.51.
Dianto, Roni, Trinas Dwi Hariyana, and David Novan Styawan. “Colonial Legacy and Gender Inequality in Marital Property Law: A Critical Analysis of Article 119 of the Indonesian Civil Code.” Journal of Judicial Review 27, no. 2 (2025): 721–746. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v27i2.11921.
Dwiyanti, Arini, and Syafira Adlina. “Ambiguitas Pengaturan Harta Bersama dalam Dimensi Kepailitan Ditinjau Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan.” Padjadjaran Law Review 11, no. 1 (2023): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v11i1.1268.
Elvina, Elvina, and Ari Wahyudi Hertanto. “Postnuptial Agreement Versus Kepentingan Kreditur.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4560–4574. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1290.
Fadilah, Rizki, and Sukiati. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual sebagai Objek Harta Bersama Perspektif Hukum Positif di Indonesia dan Hukum Islam.” Yustisi 11, no. 1 (2024): 234–247. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v11i1.16207.
Febrianty, Yenny, et al. “The Legal Position of the Wife’s Inherited Property in the Marital Joint Property Due to the Bankruptcy of the Husband.” PALAR | Pakuan Law Review 11, no. 1 (2025): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v11i1.11615.
Giyanthi, Putu Indri Sri, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti. “Status Hukum Harta Perkawinan Jika Terjadi Kepailitan Suami/Istri Tanpa Adanya Perjanjian Kawin.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.3.1.4621.37-41.
Hutchinson, Terry, and Nigel Duncan. “Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research.” Deakin Law Review 17, no. 1 (2012): 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70.
Hutchinson, Terry. “The Doctrinal Method: Incorporating Interdisciplinary Methods in Reforming the Law.” Erasmus Law Review 8, no. 3 (2015): 130–138. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000055.
Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek). Art. 119.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1974 Nomor 1, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3019.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 186, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6401.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4443.
Judiasih, Sonny Dewi, Deviana Yuanitasari, and Revi Inayatillah. “Model Perjanjian Kawin yang Dibuat Setelah Perkawinan Berlangsung Pasca Berlakunya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 3 (2018): 252–267. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.252-267.
Kurniawan, Justicia Firdaus, Dominikus Rato, and Moh. Ali. “Mixed Marriage Law on Marital Property Due to Divorce.” MIMBAR YUSTITIA: Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 8, no. 2 (2024): 111–123. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v8i2.8052.
Logika, Adela, and Teddy Anggoro. “Akibat Hukum Kepailitan Suami terhadap Harta Bersama Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 510/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Jkt.Sel.” PALAR | Pakuan Law Review 7, no. 2 (2021): 282–298. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v7i2.4174.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Bagaimana Kedudukan Pasangan yang Tak Terlibat Perjanjian Utang Piutang?” April 23, 2026. https://www.mkri.id/berita/bagaimana-kedudukan-pasangan-yang-tak-terlibat-perjanjian-utang-piutang%3F--24925.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Harta Persatuan Masuk Boedel Pailit Akibat Hukum UU Kepailitan dan PKPU.” April 9, 2026. https://www.mkri.id/berita/harta-persatuan-masuk-boedel-pailit-akibat-hukum-uu-kepailitan-dan-pkpu-24832.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Konsekuensi Hukum Putusan Pailit terhadap Persatuan Harta.” May 13, 2026. https://www.mkri.id/berita/konsekuensi-hukum-putusan-pailit-terhadap-persatuan-harta-25049.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. October 27, 2016. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/69_PUU-XIII_2015.pdf.
Munah, Fatma, and Fitra Deni. “Perlindungan Hukum Istri dalam Kepailitan Suami: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Semarang No. 01/Pailit/2019/PN.Niaga.Smg.” Binamulia Hukum 13, no. 1 (2024): 277–288. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.834.
Naibaho, Monica Yuniartha, Yuhelson, and Cicilia Julyani Tondy. “The Existence of Marriage Joint Property in the Bankruptcy Estate Due to Act of Actio Pauliana by Curator.” Jurnal Gagasan Hukum 4, no. 2 (2022): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v4i2.12147.
Prihandini, Yudiana Dewi. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pihak Ketiga atas Perjanjian Perkawinan yang Dibuat Setelah Perkawinan.” Lex Renaissance 4, no. 2 (2019): 354–366. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss2.art9.
Rachman, Tasya Putri, Bambang Eko Turisno, and Rahandy Rizki Prananda. “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pembagian Harta Kekayaan dalam Perkawinan Bila Terdapat Hibah Menurut Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 dan KUHPerdata (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batam No. 325/Pdt.G/2018/PN Btm).” Diponegoro Law Journal 11, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2022.33600.
Yuvens, Damian Agata. “Analisis Kritis terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 4 (2017): 799–819. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1445.
Zuhairoh, Silvia Handayani, Sudiarto, and I Gusti Agung Wisudawan. “Kedudukan Hukum Pisah Harta Antara Suami dan Istri dalam Kepailitan.” Commerce Law 2, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.29303/commercelaw.v2i1.1342.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
