Naraya Praja: Jurnal Pengabdian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya adalah jurnal ilmiah yang di berfokus pada publikasi hasil pengabdian kepada masyarakat di bidang hukum. Jurnal ini mencakup berbagai isu hukum dalam pengabdian kepada masyarakat, namun tidak terbatas pada edukasi dan peningkatan kesadaran hukum, advokasi dan bantuan hukum, layanan hukum, implementasi kebijakan hukum, pemberdayaan masyarakat berbasis hukum, mediasi dan penyelesaian sengketa, serta analisis dampak regulasi terhadap masyarakat. Artikel yang dimuat mencakup semua bentuk implementasi dari ilmu hukum yang memberikan kontribusi yang baik dan benar bagi masyarakat.
Naraya Praja: Jurnal Pengabdian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya is a peer-reviewed journal focused on publishing the results of community service in the field of law. This journal contains various legal issues in community engagement, including but not limited to legal education and awareness, advocacy and legal assistance, legal services, policy implementation, community empowerment through law, mediation and dispute resolution, as well as regulatory impact analysis on society. The published articles including all forms of legal implementation that provide meaningful and accurate contributions to the community.
Peer Review Process is a process in the journal assesses the quality of manuscripts prior to publication, reviewed by relevant experts in their fields to review and comment on accepted manuscripts. This process aims to help editors determine whether manuscripts should be published in the Naraya Praja: Jurnal Pengabdian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya journal. Important points in the Peer Review Process:
The Peer Review Process for journal publications is basically a quality control mechanism, which experts evaluate manuscripts with the aim of ensuring the quality of published manuscripts. However, the peer reviewer does not make a decision to accept or reject the paper, but provides a decision recommendation. In journals, decision-making authority rests solely with the journal editor or journal editorial board.
How does it work?
When a manuscript is submitted to a journal, it is assessed to see if it meets the criteria for submission. If so, the editorial team will select potential peer reviewers in the research area to peer review the manuscript and recommendations. There are four types of peer review used by various journals:
From these various types, Naraya Praja: Jurnal Pengabdian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya uses a Single-Blind Review in determining the articles to be published by Naraya Praja.
Why is peer review?
Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing which confirms the validity of the manuscript. Peer reviewers are experts who donate their time to help improve the manuscripts which their reviewing.
Peer review Step
The author submits the article to the Naraya Praja: Jurnal Pengabdian Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya journal through the online system on the Naraya Praja journal page or the article can be sent via the author's email.
The Editorial Team checks the manuscript to ensure compliance with the journal template.
The Chief Editor checks the article is appropriate for the journal, sufficiently original, and interesting. Otherwise, the article may be rejected without further review.
The editor sends invitations to someone who become reviewers.
Prospective reviewers consider the invitation according to their expertise objectively. The reviewer then accepts or rejects the article. If there is a rejection from the reviewer, the editor has to find another reviewer as an alternative.
Reviewers take time to read articles several times to form an initial impression of an article and take notes for detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject or with a request for revision before reconsideration.
Editors consider all returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ significantly, the editor may invite additional reviewers to obtain additional opinions before making a decision.
The editor emails the decision to the author including the results of the relevant reviewer's comments.
If accepted, the article is sent to production. If rejected or sent back, the author is asked to revise with comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the manuscript. At this stage, the reviewer is also sent an email to notify the author of the revised results. If the manuscript is revised again, the reviewer expects a new version of the manuscript. However, if only minor changes are requested, then the review is carried out by the editor.
