THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY FOR MEMBERS OF THE INDONESIAN NATIONAL POLICE AS NARCOTICS DEALERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v8i1.3305Abstract
Narcotics crime is a serious crime, this is caused by the impact of narcotics circulation on society. The circulation of narcotics is growing both from the method of crime and the type of narcotics. The Narcotics Law applies the death penalty as one of the penalties for drug dealers. This study discusses how the implementation of the death penalty for drug crimes for police members involved as drug dealers Decision No.56 Pid.Sus/2020PN.Dpk, and decision No.227/Pid.Sus/2020 PN. Dum, and How to Regulate the Death Penalty for Drug Dealers in the Future. The research method used is a type of normative research with a statutory, case, conceptual, and analytical approach. The results of this study show in Decision No. 56 / Pid.Sus / 2020PN.Dpk and Decision No. 227 / Pid.Sus / 2020 PN. Dum has been sentenced to death to members of the National Police who lawfully and convincingly distribute narcotics in accordance with the elements of Article 114 paragraph (2) of the Narcotics Law. The panel of judges gave its consideration based on the applicable legal provisions in line with the judge's legal decision theory, namely ratio decidendi and placed the death penalty for the defendant in the decision as nestapa or retribution in accordance with the purpose of retributive crime. The death penalty arrangement for drug dealers in the future, namely removing the death penalty provisions by revising the Criminal Code and the Narcotics Law. In practice, the execution of the death penalty has unfair trial problems, does not eliminate drug crimes, violates human rights and cannot be corrected or changed if there is an error in the verdict if the convict has been executed. This research shows that the main problem in law enforcement of narcotics trafficking is not the severity of sanctions imposed but law enforcement officials.References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adhari, Ade. 2020. Pembaharuan Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana, Yogyakarta: DEEPUBISH.
Anawar, Umar. 2016. “Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Bagi Bandar Narkoba Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusiaâ€, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13 (3).
Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2008. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana.
Bachtiar. 2018. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Tangerang Selatan: Unpam Press.
Diki Zulkarnain. 2022. “Pembinaan Narapidana Narkotika Yang Diberikan Asimilasi Dan Hak Integrasi Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Penyebaran Covid-19â€, Lex Lata: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 4 (2).
Henny Yuningsih, Nashriana, et.al. 2021. “Pelaksanaan Rehabilitasi Pengguna Narkotika Dan Psikotropika Di Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten Ogan Ilirâ€, Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8 (1).
Helmi, Muhammad. 2020. “Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Berdasarkan Paradigma Konstruktivismeâ€, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 22 (1).
Hidayat, Arif. 2013. “Penemuan Hukum Melalui Penafsiran Hakim Didalam Putusan Pengadilanâ€, Pandecta Research Law Jurnal 8 (2).
Mada Apriandi Zuhir, Nurhidayatuloh, et.al. 2020. “Presumption Of Innocentv. Presumption Of Guilt Didalam Hak Asasi Manusiaâ€, Jurnal Simbur Cahaya 26 (2).
Suyanto. 2018. Pengantar Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: DEEPUBISH.
Ward, Ian. 2018. Pengantar Teori Hukum Kritis, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Dengan mengirimkan naskah ke editor atau penerbit Anda dianggap telah memberikan izin untuk menerbitkan naskah.
© 2026 Jurnal Lex Lata, All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the