The Effectiveness of the Implementation of Customary Fines in Settlement of Seclusion Cases in Banda Aceh
Abstract
Seclusion (khalwat) is the activity conducted in a quiet place between two individuals of different sex who are not mahram (blood relative) without the legitimate marriage bond and the willingness from both parties, which leads to adultery. Fine is one of the customary penalties given to the perpetrators of khalwat. In practice, implemented of fines between one region and another is different. The study aims to identify the types of adat fines charged to khalwat perpetrators and the effectiveness of implementation on the settlement customary fines in Banda Aceh. It used a juridical-empirical research method. The data used, in addition to primary and secondary legal material, also used an in-depth interview with respondents. The data analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. This research conducted in Banda Aceh district. The research results show that the kind of customary fines given to khalwat perpetrators was different. There are even some cases begun to shift, and some considered that being married because of khalwat was considered one of the customary fines. Customary fines are effective in reducing offense of khalwat. However, there are concerns if the decision of the customary fines does not get optimal support from law enforcement officials. Expected, customary official affirmed kind of customary fine given to khalwat perpetrators. The difference subtle, need to consider the aspect of justice, the ability, and effective whereabouts of fines to reduction offense of khalwat.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdurrahman. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Adat.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 1 (2010): 127–36.
Aceh’s Qanun No.6/2014 (n.d.).
Amdani, Yusi. “Proses Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Di Lembaga Peradilan Adat Aceh Tingkat Gampong (Desa).” Asy-Syir’ah; Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 48, no. 1 (2014): 231–60.
Emergency Law No.1/1951 (n.d.).
Ferdiansyah. “The Secretary of Gampong Peulanggahan, Interview, May 26, 2018,” n.d.
Hamidi. “Head of Gampong Rukoh, Interview, May 23, 2018,” n.d.
Husin, Taqwaddin. “Penyelesaian Sengketa/Perselisihan Secara Adat Gampong Di Aceh.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 3 (2015): 511–32.
Iqlima. “The Young Clerk of Sharia Court of Aceh, Interview, May 31, 2018,” n.d.
Mahdi. “Eksistensi Peradilan Adat Di Aceh.” Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika 8, no. 2 (2011): 191.
———. “Eksistensi Peradilan Adat Di Aceh.” Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika 8, no. 2 (2011): 189–215.
Mansur, Teuku Muttaqin. Hukum Adat Perkembangan Dan Pembaruannya Di Indonesia. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2017.
———. “Penyelesaian Kasus Mesum Melalui Peradilan Adat Gampong Di Aceh (Suatu Kajian Kasus Di Banda Aceh).” Media Syari’ah 14, no. 1 (2012): 231–43.
Mansur, Teuku Muttaqin, Hamdani Zainal Abidin, Faridah Jalil, and Jasri Jamal. “Kewenangan Penyelesaian Kasus Khalwat Melalui Peradilan Adat Di Aceh.” Jurnal Hukum Respublica 13, no. 1 (2013): 48–61.
Munawar. “The Secretary of Gampong Ateuk Jawo, Interview, May 24, 2018,” n.d.
Mustafa, Akhyar. “Dasar Hukum Peradialan Adat Di Aceh,” 2015. https://www.academia.edu/15603972/Dasar_Hukum_Peradilan_Adat_di_Aceh, retrieved on June 15 2018.
Supriono, Agus. “Indigenous Ritual as Adhesive Social Harmonization: The Meaning of ‘Peusijuek’ for Young People of Aceh, Indonesia.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Antlantis Press 108 (2018): 146–59.
Wilsa, Et.al. “Efektivitas Fungsi Lembaga Adat Aceh Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Di Tingkat Gampong.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Ilmu 2, no. 3 (2016): 147–65.
Zul. “The Head of Tunggai Hamlet of Gampong Lamgugob, Interview, May 10, 2018,” n.d.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol4.Iss2.404.pp52-61
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sriwijaya Law Review (SLRev) ISSN: 2541-5298 | e-ISSN: 2541-6464 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
