The Competency of Administrative Court in Adjudicating State Financial Losses Report Dispute in Indonesia

Helmi Helmi, Fauzi Syam, Harry Setya Nugraha, Retno Kusniati

Abstract


The debate on the absolute competency of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia to set the dispute over the State Financial Losses Report (LHPKKN) is proved to have caused dissenting opinion. The judgments between one administrative court to other court in Indonesia cause main problem of achieving justice and legal certainty. This research examines the issue of absolute competence of the Administrative Court in adjudicating disputes on the State Financial Losses Report published by the Financial and Development Monitoring Agency (BPKP). This article uses normative legal research and implement the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. These approaches are used to discern and analyze several related legal materials or documents scientifically. The aims and objectives of this research are to find a legal solution on how this classic issue has to be approached and solved. As a result, it is found through this article that the Administrative Court has absolute competence in deciding disputes on the Report on the Calculation of State Financial Losses issued by the Financial and Development Monitoring Agency, which is supported by several fundamental reasons.

Keywords


Competency; State Administrative Court; Dispute; State Financial Losses Report.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggoro, Firna Novi. “Pengujian Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Terhadap Keputusan Dan/Atau Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan Oleh PTUN.” Fiat Justisia 10, no. 4 (2016): 647–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no4.803.

Butar, Sarina Gabryela Aprilyanti Butar, and Halim Dedy Perdana. “Penerapan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Internal Pemerintah Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Kasus Pada Auditor Perwakilan BPKP Provinsi Jawa Tengah).” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2017. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v20i1.1003.

Mawardi, Irvan. “Konstruksi Baru Tentang Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Dapat Diuji Di PTUN.” Mahkamah Agung RI, 2019.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.

Novrieza Rahmi. “Siapa Berwenang Menyatakan Kerugian Negara?” www.hukumonline.com, 2017. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt58ac1253a9228/siapa-berwenang-menyatakan-kerugian-negara-sema-pun-tak-mengikat/.

Otto, Jan Michiel, Suzan Stoter, and Julia Arnscheidt. “Penggunaan Teori Pembentukan Legislasi Dalam Rangka Perbaikan Kualitas Hukum Dan Proyek-Proyek Pembangunan.” In Kajian Sosio-Lagal, edited by Adriaan W. Bedner, Sulistyowati Irianto, Jan Michiel Otto, and Theresia Dyah Wirastri, 171. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan, 2012.

Philipus M. Hardjon, Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, Addink, J.B.J.M. Ten Berge. Hukum Administrasi Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Edited by Philipus M. Hadjon [et. al] - Primary Author. 1st ed. Yogyakarta Gadjah Mada Universitas Press: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2011.

Prahastapa, Anita Marlin Restu, Lapon Tukan Leonard, and Ayu Putriyanti. “Friksi Kewenangan PTUN Dalam Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Berkaitan Dengan Objek Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara (TUN).” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2017): 1–18.

Ramiyanto, Ramiyanto. “Presidential Permit to Summon Suspect of Corruption of the Member of the House of Representatives.” Sriwijaya Law Review 2, no. 2 (2018): 203. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss2.128.pp203-214.

Regulation of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency of The Republic of Indonesia Number 17 Of 2017 (2017).

“Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 54-PUU-XII/2014: Acara Mendengarkan Keterangan DPR, BPK, Serta Ahli Pemohon, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 27 Oktober 2014.” 2015.

Saragih, Yasmirah Mandasari, and Berlian Berlian. “The Enforcement of the 2009 Law Number 46 on Corruption Court: The Role of Special Corruption Court.” Sriwijaya Law Review 2, no. 2 (2018): 193–202. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss2.69.pp193-202.

Soeroso, Fajar Laksono. “Pembangkangan Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Kajian Putusan Nomor 153/G/2011/PTUN-JKT.” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 3 (2013): 227–49. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29123/jy.v6i3.100.

Sonata, Depri Liber. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum.” Fiat Justisia 8, no. 1 (2015): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283.

The Bill of State Adninistration (2014). http://perpustakaan.bappenas.go.id/lontar/opac/themes/bappenas4/templateDetail.jsp?id=121114&lokasi=lokal.

The Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (2014).

The Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Court (2009).

“Verdict of Jakarta Administrative Court Number 231/G/2012/PTUN-JKT.” 2013. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori.html.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol4.Iss2.298.pp41-51

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Sriwijaya Law Review (SLRev) ISSN: 2541-5298 | e-ISSN: 2541-6464 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




SLRev has been indexed by:
   
       
 
SLRev Member of :
  
 
 
Plagiarism Detection by: