Noer Fauzi Rachman, Hasriadi Masalam


Under the New Order authoritarian regime, the state endorsed terra-nullification of the customary territories had been the basis for the stipulation of state forest (hutan negara).After the fall of the General Suharto led regime in 1998 generated a new phase for the struggles of the customary groups in different parts of the archipelago. This article examines the rise of indigeneity and counter-hegemonic indigenous legal maneuvering spearheaded by Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN) against ongoing land dispossession in Indonesia since the fall of New Order authoritarian regime which includes the indigenous mobilizations (strategy, organization and tactics) in the post-authoritarian country, including the avenue of new types of legal activism when it comes to the creative destruction of global capitalism today. It focuses on two modes of policy advocacy and campaign against land dispossession: (a) the production of the Constitutional Court Ruling No. 35/PUU-X/2012, a new legal landmark that establishes the constitutional norm of the citizenship status of Indonesian indigenous peoples (masyarakat hukum adat) as rights bearing subjects, and the owners of their customary territory; and (b) the National Inquiry on Indigenous Peoples’ Rights held by the Indonesian National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM). The discussion describes The Colonialism of ‘State-Izing’ Customary Communities’ Territory, Contemporary Indigeneity Politics in Indonesia, Counter-Hegemonic Indigenous Legal Maneuvering, Judicial Review against The1999 Law No. 41on Forestry, National Inquiry on Indigenous Peoples’ Rights, and Connecting Counter-Hegemonic Indigenous Legal Maneuvering with the Grassroots Struggles which focuses on Mobilizing at Multiple Scales. It is concluded from this article that the efficacy of legal struggles is very much depend on the capacity to connect  with the grassroots mobilization by continuously promulgating the resurgence of indigeneity politics against the destructive impacts of corporatized state under the servitude of global capitalism, the indigenous movement constituents in Indonesia


efficacy of legal struggles; indigeneity politics;indigenous peoples;land dispossession; state izing’ customary communities

Full Text:



Araghi, F., and Karides, M. 2012. “Land dispossession and global crisis: Introduction to the special section on land rights in the world-system”. Journal of World-Systems Research, 18(1).

Bahar, S., A.B. Kusuma, and N. Hudawati, penyunting. 1995. Risalah Sidang BadanPenyelidik Usaha-Usaha PersiapanKemerdekaan Indonesia (BPUPKI), Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (PPKI), 28 Mei 1945–22 Agustus 1945. Edisi III, Second Edition. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Down to Earth. 2002. Stophuman rights violations against peasant farmers! Down to Earth No. 52, February 2002. Available at: (retrieved: Dec 23, 2016).

Gellert, P. K. 2010. “Extractive regimes: toward a better understanding of Indonesian development”.Rural Sociology. 75(1).

Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laujeng, H. 2010. “Hukum Kolonial di Negara Merdeka (Colonial Law in Independent Country)”. Naskah Belum Diterbitkan.

Moniaga, S. 2007. “From Bumi Putera to Masyarakat Adat: A long and confusing journey”, in Davidson, J. and Henley, D. (eds.) The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. Oxford and New York: Routledge.

Muttaqien, A., Ahmad, N., dan Wagiman, W. 2012. Undang-Undang Perkebunan: Wajah Baru Agrarische Wet(Plantation Law: New face of Agrarische Wet). Jakarta: ELSAM.

Peluso, N. L, and Vandergeest, P. 2001. “Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand”. Journal of Asian Studies, 60.

Peluso, N. L. 1992. Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Quijano, A. 2000. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America”. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3).

Rachman, N. F. 2011. The Resurgence of Land Reform Policy and Agrarian Movements in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California.

Rajagopal, B. 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robison, R., andHadiz, V. R. 2004. Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

Ruwiastuti, M. R. 2000. ‘”SesatPikir” Politik Hukum Agraria, Membongkar Alas Penguasaan Negara atasHak‐hakAdat’.NoerFauzi (Peny.). Yogyakarta: Insist Press, KPA danPustakaPelajar

Terkini, H., 2014. harian regional. [Online] Available at:

Buletin, L., 2017. Berita Terkini. [Online] Available at: [Accessed 1 february 2017].



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Sriwijaya Law Review (SLRev) ISSN: 2541-5298 | e-ISSN: 2541-6464 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

SLRev has been indexed by:

SLRev Member of :