INDONESIA'S DEFENSE OF SEBATIK ISLAND IN A BORDER DISPUTE BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF UTI POSSIDETIS

Novia Rahmadhani, Nguyen Thuy Anh, Allysa Maharani Suryaningtias, Ryan Phillip Azarya, Meria Utama, Rizka Nurliyantika

Abstract


Indonesia is the largest island nation on the continent of Asia. The islands of Indonesia have some 17,000 islands recorded in 2021. Of these, there are still many small islands and outer islands that remain undetected by the Indonesian government. With the presence of the outermost islands of Indonesia, the republic's sovereignty grows clearer as its borders are detected. The boundary region is an important aspect of a country because it is a highly strategic region for a country to build. The boundary region is the daily interaction between globalization and locality. Indonesia has some dispute with neighboring countries linked to the outermost island directly to one another. Sebatik island became one of the islands that had an issue with its position. Indonesia gets its territory in accordance with colonial jurisdiction. The region is obtained on the basis of the principle of uti possible. Using a qualitative approach, the writing addressed Indonesia's potential to keep the island seusing the possible principle of uti Indonesia, which is the main basis for Indonesia to win the lawsuit against Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bangsa-Bangsa, Perserikatan. Piagam PBB.pdf (1945).

Bell, Abraham, and Eugene Kontorovich. “Palestine, Uti Possidetis Juris and the Borders of Israel.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2745094.

Bernama. “Ambalat Case May Not Be Brought To International Court,” n.d.

Bryan, Garner A. Black’s Law Dictionary. 8th editio. English: Thomson West, 2004.

Divisi, Ketua, Kajian Ilmiah, and M C S Fh. “5 . 1 2,” no. 4 (1970).

Huala, Adolf. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional. Catakan 6. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Justice, International Court of. Maritime Dispute (Peru v Chile) (2014).

Muhar, Junef. “Sengketa Wilayah Maritim Di Laut China Selatan.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 18, no. 740 (2018): 22.

Nation, United. India and the united nations convention on the law of the sea, 26 Ocean Development and International Law § (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/00908329509546068.

Negeri, Ditjen Pemerintahan Umum Departemen Dalam. “Kumpulan Hasil Pelaksanaan Survei Dan Penegasan Batas Wilayah Indonesia – Malaysia Di Kalimantan Tahun 1975-1995.” Jakarta, 2004.

Saru, Arifin. “Pelaksanaan Asas Uti Possidetis Dalam Penentuan Titik Patok Perbatasan Darat Indonesia Dengan Malaysia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 16, no. 2 (2009): 183–204.https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art2.

Sholikah, Dwi Imroatus. “Analysis of the Settlement of the Sea Border Between.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 1, no. 1 (2020): 25–34.

Sobar Sutisna, Sora Lokita, Sumaryo. “Boundary Making Theory Dan Pengelolaan Perbatasan Di Indonesia.” Yogyakarta, 2008.

Suryo Sakti Hadiwijoyo. Perbatasan Negara Dalam Dimensi Hukum Internasional. Cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2011.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/scls.v2i1.3566

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Sriwijaya Crimen and Legal Studies (SCLS) P-ISSN: 2986-6367 E-ISSN: 2987-7350 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.