AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 15/PUU-XII/2014 MENGENAI PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28946/sjpl.v2i1.4809Keywords:
Legal Consequences, Arbitration, Constitutional CourtAbstract
Arbitration is one of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Arbitration itself serves as a dispute resolution method, particularly for business actors within the corporate sphere. Not infrequently, the efforts to resolve such disputes lead to results that are not accepted by the petitioners, which then triggers follow-up actions. These actions culminate in a mechanism known as the annulment of the arbitration award. This thesis analyzes the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014 on Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999, as well as the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court judges in Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014 concerning Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999. The research method used in this study is normative legal research, employing both legislative and case approaches. The result of this research shows that the legal consequence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014 on Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999 is the increased discretion of judges in deciding on the annulment of arbitration awards in court. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court judges in the ruling of MK Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014 declared that Article 70 is in conflict with the 1945 Constitution and has no binding legal force.References
Andriani, Agustini. “Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Kaitannya dengan Prinsip Final and Binding.” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 1 (2022): 31.
Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta Pustaka Belajar, 2004.
Fuady, Munir. Arbitrase Nasional (Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis). Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
Hayati, Muslimah. “Analisi Yuridis Pro Kontra Pendapat Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Ultra Petita.” Jurnal Wasaka Hukum 7, no. 1 (2019): 255-256.
Iftitah Isnantiana, Nur. “Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Islamadina 28, no. 2 (2017): 54.
Lubis, Asifah Elsa Nurahma, and Farhan Dwi Fahmi. “Pengenalan dan Definisi Hukum Secara Umum (Literature Review Etika).” Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan (JIMT) 2, no. 6 (2021): 799.
Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Citra Media, 2006.
Taufiq, Muhammad Shofwan, et al. “Penafian Royemen Putusan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Atas Penyedia Jasa Pekerja.” Al-Qisth Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 252.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (Lembar Negara Tahun 1999 Nomor 138, Tambahan Lembar Negara Nomor 3872).
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembar Negara Tahun 2009 Nomor 147, Tambahan Lembar Negara Nomor 5076).
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Please note that the journal has changed its copyright policy. From vol. 1, 2023 onwards, the author will retain the copyright if the article is accepted for publication.
