ANALYSIS OF CORRUPTION ERADICATION COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST FLEEING CORRUPTORS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW (CASE STUDY OF EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SINGAPORE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28946/scls.v2i2.4044Abstract
Extradition treaties are agreements between countries worldwide that involve the extradition of suspects or perpetrators of crimes, including economic crimes. Extradition treaties are between two countries to prevent transnational or cross-border crimes where the perpetrators flee to another country because they do not want to take responsibility for what they did. Extradition treaties have binding legal force following international law because they are international treaties. The extradition treaty made by Indonesia and Singapore is evidence of their positive cooperation in protecting law enforcement. Over the past few years, suspected Indonesian economic criminals have fled to Singapore with large amounts of money and capital. While Indonesian law cannot be applied to Singaporean territory, in the event of an extradition treaty between Indonesia and Singapore, it would have significant consequences. Suspected economic criminals can be brought back to Indonesia to be sentenced per applicable laws, while Singapore cannot. So this research aims to analyze the Extradition Treaty between Indonesia and Singapore According to International Law (Case Study of Tackling Corruption).References
Arnell, Paul. “The Contrasting Evolution of The Right to A Fair Trial in UK Extradition Law.†The International Journal of Human Rights 22, no. 7 (2018): 87–869.
Asikin, Amruddin dan Zainal. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2006.
Darmawan, S.A., Ramdhani, M. G., Nadiah, R.S., dan Padillah, A. “Dampak Ratifikasi Perjanjian Ekstradisi Antara Indonesia Dengan Singapura.†Lontar Merah 5, no. 1 (2022): 482–94.
Dzulfaroh, Ahmad Naufal dan Sari Hardiyanto. “Daftar 23 Buronan Korupsi Yang Pernah Melarikan Diri Ke Singapura.†Kompas, 2020. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/01/16/132644665/daftar-23-buronan-korupsi-yang-pernah-melarikandiri-ke-singapura?page=all.
Gunawan Y, Sastra VJ, Prakosa AT, Ovitasari M, Kurniasih LY. “The Validity of Turkey-Libya’s Agreement on Maritime Boundaries in International Law.†Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 170–85.
Gunawan, Yordan. Hukum Internasional: Sebuah Pendekatan Modern. Cetakan I,. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2021.
Hardeka, I. “Posisi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Dalam Polemik Perjanjian Bilateral RI-Singapura.†Legacy: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan 2, no. 1 (2022): 34–57.
Hiariej, Eddy Omar Sharif. “United Nations Convention Against Corruption Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.†Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 31, no. 1 (2019): 25–112.
Kalalo, Flora Pricilia. “Efektifitas Perjanjian Ekstradasi Sebagai Sarana Pencegahan, Pemberantasan, Dan Penghukuman Pelaku Tindak Pidana Internasional.†Lex et Societatis IV, no. 1 (2016).
Mamitova, Zhanat Askarovna. “On The Implementation of Article 20 of The United Nations Convention Against Corruption Into The Criminal Legislation of The Republic of Kazakhstan.†Life Science Journal 11, no. 5s (2014).
Oehmichen, Rebecca Niblock dan Anna. “Local Law Repercussions on EU Extradition Law: Perspectives from Continental Europe and England and Wales.†New Journal of European Criminal Law 8, no. 2 (2017): 27–116.
Suryagilang, Avinasa. “Penundaan Indonesia Dalam Meratifikasi Perjanjian Ekstradisi Dengan Singapura Tahun 2007-2014 (Studi Kasus: Korupsi BLBI).†Journal of International Relation 2, no. 4 (2014): 264.
Syarifuddin. “Relevansi UU No. 1 Tahun 1979 Tentang Ekstradisi Dengan Perkembangan Hukum Ekstradisi Internasional (Studi Kasus: Perjanjian Ekstradisi Indonesia Dan Singapura.†Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2016).
Wahid, Abdul. “Pemberlakuan Hukum Ekstradisi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi.†Jurnal USM Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023).
Waryenti, Deli. “Beberapa Aspek Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Ekstradisi Antara Indonesia Dan Singapura.†University of Bengkulu Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2022).
Yipeng Xi, Anfan Chen, and Weiyu Zhang. “The Expression of Cultural Identities in Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Law Amandement Bill Movement: A Semantic Network Analysis of Tweets.†Social Science Computer Review 40, no. 6 (2021).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a journal author, you have rights for a large range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission.
Authors publishing in SCLS journals have wide rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including: use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; use for internal training by author's company; distribution to colleagues for their research use; use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works; inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article); preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes (follow CC by SA License).
Authors and readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
