JURISDICTIONAL CYBERCRIME CRIMINALIZATION POLICY IN THE USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Authors

  • Serlika Aprita Muhammadiyah Palembang University
  • Wangmayum Hanif FIFA Games Company

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28946/scls.v2i2.3651

Abstract

The victim and the offender are frequently in separate nations, a crime known as cybercrime transcends all borders and periods. Cybercrime can be committed using the computer itself as the method of committing the crime and the computer network system as the target. Laws governing information technology must take into account its rapid growth. Information and communication technology laws must anticipate and lessen these negative consequences. For information, media, and communication technology to progress as much as possible, legal products about cyberspace, or mayantara, must offer security and legal certainty. In response to the increasing number of cybercrimes, the government adopted a policy on April 21, 2008, with the adoption of Law No. 11 of 2008 regarding Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE). The ITE Law is Indonesia's first legislation focusing on online regulation. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that Indonesian law enforcement has been unable to combat cybercrime to the best of its abilities. Indonesian law enforcement is facing difficulties due to the growth in cybercrime. The reasons for this are a lack of public legal awareness in efforts to combat information technology crimes, limited facilities and infrastructure, and the fact that there are still relatively few law enforcement officials who are familiar with the ins and outs of information technology (internet).

References

Arief, Indah dan Nawawi Barda. Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Dengan Pidana Penjara. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2000.

Aswandi R, Muchin PRN, Sultan M. “Perlindungan Data Dan Informasi Pribadi Melalui Indonesian Data Protection System (Idps).†Legislatif 20, no. 1 (2020): 167–90.

Didik M. Arif, Mansur dan Elisataris Ghultom. Cyber Law: Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2010.

Golose, Petrus Reinhard. “Perkembangan Cybercrime Dan Upaya Penanggulangannya Di Indonesia Oleh Polri.†Buliten Hukum Perbankan Dan Kebanksentralan 2, no. 4 (2006): 38–39.

Kominfo. “Indonesia Peringkat Ke-2 Dunia Kasus Kejahatan Siber,†2015.

Mantili R, Dewi PET. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Elektronik Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Aktual Justice 2, no. 5 (2020): 132–45.

Maskun. Kejahatan Siber CyberCrime : Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Muladi. “Kebijakan Kriminal Terhadap Cybercrime.†Majalah Media Hukum 3, no. 1 (2003).

Polri, Pusiknas. “Kejahatan Siber Di Indonesia Naik Berkali-Kali Lipat.†Pusiknas Polri, 2022.

Raharjo, Agus. Cybercrime: Pemahaman Dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi. Bandung: Citra, 2002.

Saragih, Y.M., & Siahaan, A.P.U. “Cyber Crime Prevention Strategy in Indonesia.†J.Humanit.Soc.Sci, SSRG Int. 6, no. 3 (2016): 22–26.

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Marmudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.

Sudarto. Hukum Pidana Dan Perkembangan Masyarakat. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1983.

Suhariyatno, Budi. Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime) Urgensi Pengaturan Dan Celah Hukumnya. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.

Surhayanto, Budi. Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime) Urgensi Pengaturan Dan Celah Hukumnya. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.

Widodo. Sistem Pemidanaan Dalam Cyber Crime. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama, 2009.

Downloads

Published

12/25/2024

Issue

Section

Articles