PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM BANK YANG MENGHILANGKAN DOKUMEN SURAT KEPUTUSAN PENGANGKATAN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL SEBAGAI JAMINAN KREDIT

Ela Andini Putri, Annalisa Yahanan

Abstract


In practice, the Civil Servant Appointment Decree can be used as credit guarantee, but sometimes there are banks as creditors (guarantors) have lost the Decree, thus causing losses to customers as debtors. The aim of this research is to explain and analyze the judge's legal considerations and liability of the Bank for losing credit guarantee documents based on Mataram District Court Decision Number 245/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Mtr. This research is normative legal research, with a collecting legal materials technique obtained from literature studies. The result of this research indicates that the standing of the Civil Servant Appointment Decree in Indonesian guarantee law is that it is not a form of guarantee according to general guarantees and special guarantees which consist of material guarantees and individual guarantees. However, the Bank accepted the Civil Servant Appointment Decree as credit guarantee for civil servants through a credit agreement, on the grounds that it had economic value, because the Bank was given a power of attorney from the debtor's office to deduct the debtor's salary. Regarding the judge's legal considerations, this was because the Bank as the Defendant had committed an unlawful act in the form of negligence which caused the Plaintiff to no longer have the opportunity to use his Civil Servant Appointment Decree as guarantee for credit at another Bank in the future, and therefore, the Defendant was obliged to take responsibility for his negligence by replacing losses suffered by the Plaintiff. Regarding the Bank's liability, it is declared negligent for committing an unlawful act with a penalty of compensating for the losses suffered by the Plaintiff and the potential for administrative sanctions in the form of fines, written warnings, suspension of certain business activities, and revocation of business permits by the Management of Bank Indonesia, including the potential for imprisonment and fines against the Board of Directors or bank employees if they are proven to have intentionally lost the documents

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chidir Ali. 2007. Badan Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.

D. Dalimunthe. 2018. Objek Gadai dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BW). Jakarta: Yurisprudentia.

Eko Sudarmanto. 2021. Manajemen Risiko Perbankan. Jakarta: Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Hermansyah. 2005. Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

J. Satrio. 1996. Hukum Jaminan, Hak-Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Leni Oktafiani, Irdanuraprida Idris. 2017. “Pelaksanaan Pemberiak Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Pada Debitur PT Bank DKI Jakarta Pusat,” Lex Jurnalica 12(2).

Munir Fuady. 2002. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Pendekatan Kontemporer. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

P.N.H. Simanjuntak. 2009. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.

R. Subekti. 2009. Jaminan-Jaminan Untuk Pemberian Kredit Menurut Hukum Indonesia, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahmat Surkhalid Nasution. 2021. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pemberian Fasilitas Pembiayaan Modal Kerja Fiktif Oleh Bank Mengenai Prosedur Dokumen dan Jaminan (Studi di Bank Muamalat Indonesia Cabang Kota Medan),” Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 9(1).

Rahmi Zubaedah, Imanudin Affandi, dan Dede Suana Ependi. 2022. “Aspek Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Bank Atas Hilangnya Benda Berharga Milik Nasabah Yang Disimpan Dalam Safe Deposit Box dan Upaya Penyelesaiannya,” Jurnal Tahkim 18(1).

Rika Suprapty. 2021. Hukum Perbankan. Labuhanbatu: Sihsawit Publisher.

Risdy Ardiansyah. 2021. “Tindakan Fraud Dalam Hal Rekayasa Pelunasan Kredit Oleh Pegawai Bank Dalam Transaksi Perbankan Dikaitkan Dengan Prinsip Kehati-hatian,” Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran 3(1).

Salim HS. 2004. Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Satria Anggara Pinandita. 2020. “Analisa Penjatuhan Sanksi Administrasi Dan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perbankan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan Beserta Perubahannya,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 4(4).

Suci Sulistiawati. 2022. “Pertanggungjawaban Perbankan Sebagai Korporasi Atas Penggelapan Dana Nasabah yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Bank,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tatohi 2(5).

Sugiyanto dan Annalisa Yahanan. 2022. “Perlindungan Hukum Pengarang Sebagai Pemegang Hak Cipta Dalam Penerbitan Buku,” Lex Lata 4(1).

Verawati dan Safrina. 2019. “Surat Keputusan Pengangkatan Pegawai Negeri Sebagai Jaminan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan 3(3).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v6i3.3295

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons
Lex LATA Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum (LexL), P-ISSN: 2714-6723 dan e-ISSN: 2657-0343 disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

 

LexLata terindeks oleh:
  
 
 
Plagiarism oleh: