The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
Abstract
This research aims to understand and clarify the international legal perspec-tive relating to the current dispute and how they are resolved according to international law between Vietnam and China over fishing rights in the South China Sea. This paper has adopted a normative legal research with a statutory and historical approaches. The data will be analysed by using de-scriptive-analytical analysis. This paper reveals that there are two legal is-sues in the fishing rights conflict between Vietnam and China. First is the legality of the Nine-dashed Line by China to claim the disputed water. Sec-ond, the legality of unilateral fishing ban policy by China over the disputed water, which both has no legality under international law. Although China claims over SCS using Nine-dashed Line and unilateral fishing ban policy under international law has no legal basis, the dispute over SCS including fishing rights continued until today. The solutions offered to solve these problems include a resolution on SCS dispute must be made legally and di-plomacy to build confidence-building measures. Ideally, both states should honour the accepted negotiation steps to agree upon compensation for the effects of the disputes and be sincere and earnest in their attempts and com-mitment to resolving their dispute.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agoes, Etty R. “Praktik Negara-Negara Atas Konsepsi Negara Kepulauan.” Indonesia Journal of International Law 1, no. 3 (2004): 462.
Andreone, Gemma. The Future of the Law of the Sea: Bridging Gaps Between National, Individual and Common Interests. Rome: Springer Nature, 2017.
Bernard, Leonardo. “The Right to Fish and International Law in the South China Sea.” Journal of Political Risk 4, no. 1 (2016): 37.
Brownlie, Ian. “Principles of Public International Law.” VRU Verfassung Und Recht in Ubersee 14, no. 1 (1980): 92–93.
Buszynski, Leszek. “The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry.” The Washington Quarterly 35, no. 2 (2012): 139–56.
Chau, Mai Ngoc. “Vietnam Rejects China’s South China Sea Fishing Ban.” Blommberg Quint, 2020. https://www.bloombergquint.com/global-economics/vietnam-rejects-china-s-south-china-sea-fishing-ban.
Djalal, Hasjim. Indonesia and the Law of the Sea. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 1995.
Emmers, Ralf. ASEAN and the Institutionalisation of East Asia. London: Routledge, 2012.
Farhana, Faudzan. “Memahami Perspektif Tiongkok Dalam Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan.” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 11, no. 1 (2014): 167–80.
Gao, Zhiguo, and Bing Bing Jia. “The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History.” American Society of International Law 107, no. 1 (2013): 98–124.
Gunawan, Yordan. Hukum Internasional: Sebuah Pengantar Modern. Yogyakarta: LP3M UMY, 2021.
Haryanto, Agus, and Arief Bakhtiar. “Sengketa Laut Tiongkok Selatan: Ancaman Bagi Komunitas Keamanan ASEAN?” Global & Strategi 9, no. 2 (2015): 277–96.
Henriksen, Tore. “Promoting Sustainable Fisheries: The International Legal and Policy Framework to Combat Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing.” Ocean Yearbook Online 26, no. 1 (2012): 712–20.
Hongzhou, Zhang, and Sam Betemen. “Fishing Militia, the Securitization of Fishery and the South China Sea Dispute.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 39, no. 2 (2017): 288–314.
Hsiao, Amanda. “Opportunities for Fisheries Enforcement Cooperation in the South China Sea.” Marine Policy 121 (2020): 2.
Ishak, Nurfaika, and Siti Fatimah. “Pengawasan Penangkapan Ikan Di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia Dalam Membangun Poros Maritim Indonesia.” Wacana Hukum 25, no. 2 (2019): 59–77.
Klien, Natalie. Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea. London: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Koers, Albert, Rudi Rizki, and Wahyuni Bahar. Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Tentang Hukum Laut: Suatu Ringkasan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Universitas Press, 2014.
Malik, Mohan. “Historical Fiction: China’s South China Sea Claims.” World Affairs 176, no. 1 (2013): 87.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Vol. 2. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Nainggolan, Poltak Partogi. South China Sea Conflict and Its Implications for Regions. Jakarta: P3DI Secretariat General of the Republic of Indonesia Parliament, 2013.
Poling, Gregory B. The South China Sea in Focus: Clarifying the Limits of Maritime Dispute. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.
Ramkumar, Mu, and M. Santosh. “Hydrocarbon Reserves of the South China Sea: Implications for Regional Energy Security.” Energy Geoscience, 2020, 6.
Sohn, Louis B, John Noyes, Erik Frankx, and Kristen Juras. Cases and Materials on the Law of the Sea. 2nd ed. Leiden: Nijhoff, 2014.
Song, Xinyi, Feniosky Pena-Mora, Carol C. Menassa, and Carlos A. Arboleda. “Determining the Optimal Premium for ADR Implementation Insurance in Construction Dispute Resolution.” Journal of Management in Engineering 30, no. 4 (2014): 12.
Storey, Ian. “Hardening Positions over Dangerous Grounds: Recent Developments in the South China Sea Dispute.” CSIS Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2011, 20–21.
Sudira, I Nyoman. "The South China Sea: Oil, Maritime Claims, and U.S.-China Strategic Rivalry.” International Relations Scientific Journal 10, no. 2 (2014): 143.
Sumaila, U. Rashid, and William W. L. Cheung. Boom or Bust: The Future of Fish in the South China Sea. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 2015.
Tuan, Ha Anh. “The Tragedy of Vietnamese Fishermen: The Forgotten Faces of Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea.” Asia Journal of Global Studies 5, no. 2 (2013): 94–107.
Zhang, Hongzhou. “Fisheries Cooperation in the South China Sea: Evaluating the Options.” Marine Policy 89 (2018): 67–76.
Zou, Keyuan, and Xinchang Liu. “Skip Nav Destination Article Navigation The Legal Status of the U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea and Its Legal Implications for Sovereignty, Sovereign Rights and Maritime Jurisdiction.” Chinese Journal of International Law 14, no. 1 (2015): 73.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.875.pp205-217
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sriwijaya Law Review (SLRev) ISSN: 2541-5298 | e-ISSN: 2541-6464 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
