IMPLEMENTATION OF PANCASILA VALUES IN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OF NEGOTIATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28946/scls.v2i1.3749Abstract
Courts that accommodate dispute resolution are still not optimal in implementing fair decisions for the parties. Not only has it not created justice, but it has not been able to resolve the dispute quickly. In the end, there was a backlog of cases, so the simple, fast, low-cost justice principle was difficult to realize. Alternative Dispute Resolution is one of the efforts that can be implemented to assist the court in reducing the number of cases piling up, one of which is in the form of negotiations as regulated in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. In principle, negotiations are concerned with implementing the Principle of Deliberation and Consensus as implied in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution as stipulated in the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act. The problematic legal issues in its implementation are compiled in this article, analyzing the weaknesses of Negotiation as an Alternative for Resolving Business Law Disputes in Indonesia as well as the context for the Implementation of Pancasila Values. The type of research used is normative juridical with descriptive research type. The results that will be discussed explain the technical weaknesses of Alternative Dispute Resolution through Negotiations, which are generally linked to business law events in Indonesia in applying Pancasila values, especially the values of Humanity and Deliberation to Consensus. This writing concludes that Alternative Dispute Resolution must continue to be pursued in resolving disputes and in minimizing the weaknesses of the process, including opinions are submitted systematically, politely, and creatively, looking for common ground wisely, viewing the other party as family to create a family atmosphere, and accommodating Pancasila values as a guide to implementing written law.References
Adolf, Haula. Arbitrase Komersial Internasional. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
Albar, Andi Ardillah. “DINAMIKA MEKANISME ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM KONTEKS HUKUM BISNIS INTERNASIONAL.†Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 1, no. 1 (2019).
Donandi, Sujana, and Etty Susilowati. “Arti Penting Perjanjian Tertulis Antara Pemilik Dan Pengguna Karya Seni Fotografi Untuk Kepentingan Promosi Komersial.†Law Reform 11, no. 1 (2015): 43. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v11i1.15753.
Harahap, M Yahya. Arbitrase. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.
Harahap, Syaiful Khoiri. “Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Penolakan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional.†Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 7, no. 1 (2022): 75. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i1.707.
Jeriko, Yohanes, Giovanni Rama, Adi Saputra, Sunadynatha Selvin, Matthew Chandra, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Tarumanagara. “Internalisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Profesi Hukum Mediator Dalam Rangka Membangun Integritas†7, no. 1 (2023): 925.
Korah, Revy S. M. “Mediasi Merupakan Salah Satu Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Dalam Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional.†Jurnal Hukum UNSRAT 21, no. 3 (2013): 33–42.
Kumar, Ashok. International Alternative Dispute Resolution System. New Delhi India: K.K. Publications, 2021.
Kurniati. “Peluang Dan Kendala Pengembangan Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.†Doctrinal 4, no. 1 (2019): 943.
Long, Joshua. “ODD ONE OUT : INCONSISTENCY IN THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT ’ S JURISDICTIONAL LANGUAGE O DD O NE O UT : I NCONSISTENCY IN THE F EDERAL A RBITRATION A CT ’ S†2024, no. 1 (2024).
Mahayuni, I Gusti Ayu Made Yustina. “Alternatif Penegakan Hukum Pidana Melalui Musyawarah Mufakat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.†Acta Comitas 4, no. 3 (2019): 397. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i03.p05.
Margono, Suyud. Alternative Dispute Resolution Dan Arbitrase: Proses Pelembagaan Dan Aspek Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2004.
Moffit, Michael L, and Robert C Bordone. Handbook Dispute Resolution, Harvard Law School, 2005.
Moscati, Maria Federica, and Michael Palmer. Comparative Dispute Resolution. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020.
Nusantara, Erik Meza. “Relevansi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Pemberlakuan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 6, no. 1 (2024): 10. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v6i1.1-17.
Prasetyo, Edy, and Sigit Herman Binaji. “Kedudukan Penyelesaian Non Litigasi Dalam Hukum Pidana Pada Kasus Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Mengakibatkan Korban Jiwa Studi Kasus Di Wilayah Hukum Kabupaten Klaten.†Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum 4, no. 1 (2020): 468. https://doi.org/10.37159/jmih.v4i1.1218.
Pratama, G, and R Melati. “Regional Expansion in Indonesia: Perspectives on Development Law Theory.†Sriwijaya Crimen and Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.28946/scls.v1i1.2610.
Purba, Rehngena. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ALTERNATIF MELALUI MEDIASI,†n.d., 43.
Purnawati, Ishmah. “PEMBARUAN PERADILAN SEBAGAI IKHTIAR MEWUJUDKAN COURT EXCELLENCE.†Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2021.
Putri, Litari Elisa, Hamzah, and Yulia Kusuma Wardani. “Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Jasa Perjalanan (Travel Agency) Terhadap Konsumennya (Studi Pada PT Arie Tours Dan Travel Cabang Bandar Lampung)â€, Pactum Law Journal.†Pactum Law Journal 1 no 2 (2018): 118.
Putri Rusadi, Fry Anditya Rahayu, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. “Optimalisasi Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Di Luar Pengadilan.†Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 1 (2021): 153. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v10i1.8088.
Rajagukguk, Erman. Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif. Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Setiawan, Chandra. “Manifestasi Pancasila Melalui Trisakti Sebagai Pedoman Mewujudkan Amanat Penderitaan Rakyat.†Jurnal Pembumian Pancasila 2 (2022).
Stobbe, Stepahanie P. Conflict Resolution in Asia: Mediation and Other Cultural Models. Edited by Lexington Books. USA, n.d.
Sulistiowati, Mrs, Mr Nurhasan Ismail, Mr Paripurna, and Mr Sulastriyono. “The Values of Pancasila in Business Activities in Indonesia (Case Studies of Limited Liability Company and Cooperation).†Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 28, no. 1 (2016): 107. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15869.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Citra Media, 2006.
Winata, Frans Hendra. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa: Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Dan Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
Zelst, Bas van, and Naimeh Masumy. “The Concept of Arbitrability under the New York Convention: The Quest for Comprehensive Reform.†Journal of International Arbitration, 2024, 345–70
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a journal author, you have rights for a large range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission.
Authors publishing in SCLS journals have wide rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including: use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; use for internal training by author's company; distribution to colleagues for their research use; use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works; inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article); preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes (follow CC by SA License).
Authors and readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
